Isolationist or noninterventionist?
I can kind of understand when I run across some goofball on the interwebs who accuses libertarians of being isolationist due to our opposition to meddling in other countries’ affairs, but it’s at least a little surprising and disheartening to see the Pew Research Center and someone whose title is “AP Diplomatic Writer” using the same bad definition: Poll: Isolationism Soars Among Americans
What he clearly meant by “isolationism” was “noninterventionism.” An isolationist is someone who literally wants to see his country isolated from the global community–he wants a ceasing or reduction of not only official intervention but also things such as trade and travel. A noninterventionist is someone who simply opposes his national government intervening in the affairs of other countries. Libertarians are noninterventionist because we oppose intervention but are NOT isolationist since we advocate maximum freedom of movement and trade. I would expect that very few people are truly isolationist except for maybe a handful of hardcore authoritarian populists.
Pew appears to have based its claim of increasing isolationism on the respondents’ answer to the statements, “The U.S. should mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own,”and, “We should not think so much in international terms but concentrate more on our own national problems and building up our strength and prosperity here at home.” At the same time, the poll shows a marked increase in support for free trade agreements, which are a pretty good proxy for gauging support for actual free trade since so many people perceive these agreements as free trade.
So what Pew’s own poll shows is a strong trend not toward isolationism but toward the libertarian principle of nonintervention.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
